Schipske District 5 Journal.com

Archive for the 'Bunker fuel' Category

05 Apr

We need the same pollution reduction initiatives in Long Beach

The Los Angeles Times ran a story on Thursday, April 3 entitled: “Harbor Reaches Pollution Accord.”
Sadly, the story wasn’t about “our” harbor — it was about the Los Angeles Harbor.
And here’s what is being done: the Port of LA have agreed to pay $12 millin over the next year on pollution reduction initiatives in adjacent […]

24 Jan

Boston Legal and Daring to Ask Questions

Following the underwhelming support I received last Tuesday night to refer to the Council Committee on Economic Development for “discussion” the issue of increasing the amount of profits transferred from the Harbor Department…a department of the City… I went home and watched my favorite (actually second favorite) surreal Tuesday night show — “Boston Legal” and […]

18 Jan

Getting Back to Council Business

I am placing several items on the January 22nd Council agenda aimed at dealing with some of the serious financial and environmental problems facing the City of Long Beach, including a proposal to increase the transfer of Port of Long Beach funds and allow use of a portion of the transferred funds for non-tidelands area […]

05 Jan

Bunker Fuel is Tax Free and is Killing Long Beach

Don’t take my word for it. Look at the front pages of the Press Telegram and the Los Angeles Times today and read how pollution from the ports is harming and killing (via cancer and respiratory illness) Long Beach.  Then click on to this file and read Health Impact of Bunker Fuel . You might also recall […]

© 2008 Schipske District 5 Journal.com | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

Powered by Wordpress, design by Web4 Sudoku, based on Pinkline by GPS Gazette